Let’s discuss the latest QAnon post concerning Democrats money laundering and embezzling taxpayer dollars with the help of Planned Parenthood and other NGO’s (Non-Governmental Organizations). One big circle of money laundering, corruption, and pay for play.
Many of us were called conspiracy theorists for questioning the official narrative given by the DNC of what happened during the 2016 Presidential Election.
Thanks to revelations in Donna Braziles recently published book, “Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House”, there are a whole new set of questions that need to be asked.
Now let’s take a look at some of what has been revealed in Donna Brazile’s “Hacks”:
Jerome Corsi writes:
On page 33, Brazile admits the Hillary Victory Fund was used to pay off the DNC debt left by Obama. There, Brazile wrote:
Obama left the party $24 million in debt – $15 million in bank debt and more than $8 million owed to vendors after the 2012 campaign and had been paying that off very slowly. Obama’s campaign was not scheduled to pay it off until 2016. Hillary for America and the Hillary Victory Fund had taken care of 80 percent of the remaining debt in 2016, about $10 million, and had placed the DNC on an allowance.
To even the untrained eye, one can see that Hillary Clinton bought her nomination.
Brazile’s first problem occurred when she realized that Hillary’s campaign had begun controlling the disbursement of the Hillary Victory Fund before Hillary became the nominee. On page 35, Brazile continues the narrative, writing:
“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”
Gary Gensler said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.
You can’t make this stuff up!
What Donna Brazile realized after she took over the DNC when Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned over the WikiLeaks email scandal was that Hillary Clinton diverted the Hillary Victory Fund money away from the states in an apparent money-laundering scheme that forced the states to wire the money back to the DNC almost as soon as the Hillary Victory Fund had wired to the states their portions.
Finally, Brazile realized that Hillary’s campaign devised and implemented this scheme only after the DNC agree to allow Hillary before she was the nominee to control the DNC, in exchange for diverting to the DNC from the states the states’ share of the Hillary Victory Fund proceeds.
Donna Brazile: Clinton Campaign was a Cult
And we cannot ignore this revelation: Debbie Wasserman Schultz blocked the FBI from forensically analyzing the “Hacked” DNC Servers. Unbelievable! What were they trying to hide?
We have been right, Infowars, Daily Caller, Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge, all of us are vindicated for questioning the official narrative surrounding the DNC “Hacks”.
As far as my theory goes on the possibility that any hacks being directed at the DNC servers was most likely perpetrated by the hacker group “Anonymous”, here I provide some evidence. “Anonymous” had been warning Hillary Clinton that she was a target as far back as June of 2015.
In my opinion, the hacks of the DNC Servers was a targeted attack by “Anonymous” to try to gather as much information on Hillary Clinton’s corruption as possible. I think that using Russia as a scapegoat was logical for them considering they had been planning on painting Donald Trump as a Russian agent for almost a year, mostly to divert attention from Hillary Clinton’s own dirty deals with Russia.
Well there are a lot of us that are feeling really vindicated right now as the shit begins to hit the fan!
Here’s what I’m talking about:
This is the same James Comey that claims President Trump tried to influence him.
This is like the gift that keeps on giving!
Obama Admin’s Russia-Uranium Deal Gets ‘Full-Scale’ Corruption Probe from Senate Judiciary Committee
That entire administration and all the people who surrounded them are corrupt as hell.
Trey Gowdy knows James Comey was full of SH*T:
Lots of Swamp Draining is in the future
McCabe Was Involved in Russian Bribery Scheme AND Hillary’s Exoneration Statement – Why is He STILL in the FBI?
The Weiner that keeps on giving:
Judge Napolitano: New Emails Found on Anthony Weiner’s Computer Will Lead to Hillary Clinton Indictment (Video)
No, this wasn’t done so she could hide her crimes.. The Deep State would never let that happen.. (yes that’s sarcasm)
I think I can feel the suction of the plug being pulled on the D.C. Swamp
Today is a good day for America, The truth will always see the light of day.. And as it turns out, Sunlight is the best disinfectant
AntiFa’s leadership should trouble people as much as the goons on the street, if not more. They have already been caught planning terrorist attacks against conservatives.
California vote-fraud scandal blows up by Jon Rappoport August 8, 2017 The watchdog group, Judicial Watch, is threatening to file a lawsuit if the state government of California doesn’t clean up it…
Source: California vote scandal blows up
One of the biggest stories coming out of the latest James Comey testimony on capitol hill, aside from the complete collapse of the “Russiagate” narrative, is that Loretta Lynch purposely tried to undermine the Hillary Clinton email scandal probe!
James Comey confirmed on June 8th, that Loretta Lynch attempted to influence the probe into Hillary Clinton’s illegal use of a private server to conduct State Department business.
The unsecured server housed thousands of emails that contained classified/secret and or privileged information. Many IT specialists have spoken out about the vulnerability of the system Hillary Clinton used and it’s almost non-existent security.
Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch attempted to bury the investigation after meeting with former President Bill Clinton, a move which drew much criticism at the time. Later James Comey confronted Loretta Lynch about her interference.
Comey told lawmakers in the close door session that he raised his concern with the attorney general that she had created a conflict of interest by meeting with Clinton’s husband, the former President Bill Clinton, on an airport tarmac while the investigation was ongoing.
During the conversation, Comey told lawmakers he confronted Lynch with a highly sensitive piece of evidence, a communication between two political figures that suggested Lynch had agreed to put the kibosh on any prosecution of Clinton.
This is huge, I suspect that James Comey is attempting to protect his own name by blowing the lid on Loretta Lynch’s involvement. However, the question I have is, what was Barack Obama’s involvement in Loretta Lynch’s decision to kill the Clinton email investigation? I find it highly unlikely that she would move forward with such a task without the go ahead from former President Obama. If he did have knowledge of the decision, was it under his direct order? If not, who in the Obama Administration okay such a move?
The article goes on to state:
Comey said “the attorney general looked at the document then looked up with a steely silence that lasted for some time, then asked him if he had any other business with her and if not that he should leave her office,” said one source who was briefed.
If testimony like this is being given behind closed doors I think it is in the public interest that such information be brought to the public arena. The American people deserve to know the truth, that all evidence shows that the only election interference that went on in 2016 was perpetrated by the Obama Administration and the DNC, and that the whole “Russiagate” story is fake news. They also deserve to know if the Democratic Establishment tried to use Federal power to carry out this interference.
We need to demand that a real and thorough investigation be conducted into the DEMOCRATIC interference of the 2016 Election. Loretta Lynch a long with a few other members of the Obama Administration that were tied to the Hillary Clinton Email Scandal Investigation, should all be investigated and made to testify in front of congress about their crimes.
From: Chris Menahan
Jun. 09, 2017
A new poll from IBD/TIPP found the overwhelmingly majority of young Americans believe “the media has prematurely declared President Trump and his allies guilty of collusion with Russia” despite a lack of evidence.
From Investor’s Business Daily:
Americans overwhelmingly blame the media for the hoopla surrounding the Russian investigation, with 57% agreeing that “the media has prematurely declared President Trump and his allies guilty of collusion with Russia” despite a lack of evidence. Just 39% disagreed.
And once again, the partisan split was notable, with 83% of Republicans agreeing that the media had displayed bias, but just 32% of Democrats saying the same. Some 62% of independents saw media bias in the coverage of the Russia investigation.
Perhaps surprisingly, the age group that saw the greatest media effect was the youngest — the 18-to-24 year-old age group, with 72% agreeing that the media had essentially treated Trump and his campaign officials as guilty in covering the Russia issue without providing evidence. All of the other age groups were in the 53% to 59% range.
From: The Daily Caller
The presidential election of 2016 shocked the world, but no one was more shocked than Hillary Clinton. A new book on the Clinton campaign contains the revelation that Clinton had to be pressured into conceding her loss on election night by President Barack Obama.
“POTUS doesn’t think it’s wise to drag this out,” White House political director David Simas is reported as saying to Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager.
The campaign did not concede at that point.