Many of us were called conspiracy theorists for questioning the official narrative given by the DNC of what happened during the 2016 Presidential Election.
Thanks to revelations in Donna Braziles recently published book, “Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House”, there are a whole new set of questions that need to be asked.
Now let’s take a look at some of what has been revealed in Donna Brazile’s “Hacks”:
Jerome Corsi writes:
On page 33, Brazile admits the Hillary Victory Fund was used to pay off the DNC debt left by Obama. There, Brazile wrote:
Obama left the party $24 million in debt – $15 million in bank debt and more than $8 million owed to vendors after the 2012 campaign and had been paying that off very slowly. Obama’s campaign was not scheduled to pay it off until 2016. Hillary for America and the Hillary Victory Fund had taken care of 80 percent of the remaining debt in 2016, about $10 million, and had placed the DNC on an allowance.
To even the untrained eye, one can see that Hillary Clinton bought her nomination.
Brazile’s first problem occurred when she realized that Hillary’s campaign had begun controlling the disbursement of the Hillary Victory Fund before Hillary became the nominee. On page 35, Brazile continues the narrative, writing:
“Wait,” I said. “That victory fund was supposed to be for whoever was the nominee, and the state party races. You’re telling me that Hillary has been controlling it since before she got the nomination?”
Gary Gensler said the campaign had to do it or the party would collapse.
You can’t make this stuff up!
What Donna Brazile realized after she took over the DNC when Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned over the WikiLeaks email scandal was that Hillary Clinton diverted the Hillary Victory Fund money away from the states in an apparent money-laundering scheme that forced the states to wire the money back to the DNC almost as soon as the Hillary Victory Fund had wired to the states their portions.
Finally, Brazile realized that Hillary’s campaign devised and implemented this scheme only after the DNC agree to allow Hillary before she was the nominee to control the DNC, in exchange for diverting to the DNC from the states the states’ share of the Hillary Victory Fund proceeds.
Donna Brazile: Clinton Campaign was a Cult
And we cannot ignore this revelation: Debbie Wasserman Schultz blocked the FBI from forensically analyzing the “Hacked” DNC Servers. Unbelievable! What were they trying to hide?
We have been right, Infowars, Daily Caller, Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge, all of us are vindicated for questioning the official narrative surrounding the DNC “Hacks”.
As far as my theory goes on the possibility that any hacks being directed at the DNC servers was most likely perpetrated by the hacker group “Anonymous”, here I provide some evidence. “Anonymous” had been warning Hillary Clinton that she was a target as far back as June of 2015.
In my opinion, the hacks of the DNC Servers was a targeted attack by “Anonymous” to try to gather as much information on Hillary Clinton’s corruption as possible. I think that using Russia as a scapegoat was logical for them considering they had been planning on painting Donald Trump as a Russian agent for almost a year, mostly to divert attention from Hillary Clinton’s own dirty deals with Russia.